Sacred Atlas
← All parallels
ParallelsA comparative study
ChristianityJudaismIslamHinduismBuddhismTaoismConfucianism

On The Golden Rule

The ethical principle of reciprocity — treat others as you wish to be treated (positive form) or do not do what you would not want done to you (negative form). Found in virtually every major religious tradition, sometimes called the most universal religious teaching.

Share
Extended commentary

The principle of reciprocity serves as a foundational ethical axiom across diverse religious traditions, often presented as a concise summary of the entire moral law. In Christianity, Jesus articulates the positive form in Matthew 7:12, declaring, "Whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them," identifying this as the fulfillment of the Law and the Prophets. Similarly, the Jewish sage Hillel, when challenged to summarize the Torah, offered the negative formulation: "What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbour," noting that the remainder is merely commentary (Talmud Shabbat 31a). Islamic tradition echoes this through the Hadith, stating, "None of you truly believes until he wishes for his brother what he wishes for himself." Eastern traditions provide parallel insights; the Mahabharata advises, "do naught unto others what you would not have them do unto you," while Confucius defines the lifelong rule of practice as shu, or reciprocity: "What you do not want done to yourself, do not do to others" (Analects 15:23). Taoism expands this to empathetic identification, urging believers to "regard your neighbour's gain as your own gain." While the core mechanism of projecting one's own desires onto others remains constant, meaningful divergence exists between the positive imperative to actively do good and the negative prohibition against causing harm. Furthermore, the theological underpinnings vary, ranging from divine commandment in Abrahamic faiths to the cultivation of innate human virtue in Confucianism and the mitigation of suffering in Buddhism, reflecting distinct soteriological goals within a shared ethical framework.

Held in common

What every account tells.

  • iReciprocity as the foundation of ethics
  • iiOften stated as a summary of the entire moral law
Where they part

How each tradition tells it.

Christianity

Positive form: 'Whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them' (Matt 7:12). Called by Jesus 'the law and the prophets'.

Judaism

Hillel (1st c. BCE): 'What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbour. This is the whole Torah; the rest is commentary.' (Talmud Shabbat 31a)

Islam

Hadith of the Prophet: 'None of you truly believes until he wishes for his brother what he wishes for himself.' (Bukhari, Muslim)

Hinduism

Mahabharata: 'This is the sum of duty; do naught unto others what you would not have them do unto you.'

Buddhism

Udana-Varga: 'Hurt not others in ways you yourself would find hurtful.'

Taoism

T'ai Shang Kan Ying P'ien: 'Regard your neighbour's gain as your own gain and your neighbour's loss as your own loss.'

Confucianism

Analects 15:23 — Tsze-kung asked, 'Is there one word which may serve as a rule of practice for all one's life?' The Master said, 'Is not RECIPROCITY (shu) such a word? What you do not want done to yourself, do not do to others.'


Side by side

Read the passages as one.

Each scripture’s own words, laid alongside the others.

Christianity7:12
Matthew
Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
Christianity6:31
Luke
And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise.
Confucianism15:23
The Analects
Tsze-kung asked, saying, 'Is there one word which may serve as a rule of practice for all one's life?' The Master said, 'Is not RECIPROCITY such a word? What you do not want done to yourself, do not do to others.'
Read the full chapter →James Legge, 1893
Buddhism10:129
Dhammapada
All men tremble at punishment, all men fear death. Remembering that he is like unto them, let no one kill, nor cause another to kill.
Read the full chapter →Max Müller, 1881
Related themes

Where else this study appears.

Share

Discussion

No one has written anything here yet. Some places to begin:

  • Which tradition's framing of this idea felt strongest to you, and why?
  • What's missing from this comparison — a tradition or a passage that should be here?
  • Has reading these side-by-side changed how you'd read any of them alone?

    Sign in to join the discussion.